Date: July 8th, Discipline: Education. Date: June 26th, Discipline: Sports. Date: June 6th, Pages: 7. Writer's choice - please select choices given on outline for project. Date: May 19th, Our Custom Essay Writing Service Features. Qualified Writers.

We care about the privacy of our clients and will never share your personal information with any third parties or persons. Free Turnitin Report. A plagiarism report from Turnitin can be attached to your order to ensure your paper's originality. Negotiable Price. No Hidden Charges. Every sweet feature you might think of is already included in the price, so there will be no unpleasant surprises at the checkout.

You can contact us any time of day and night with any questions; we'll always be happy to help you out. Free Features. Place An Order. Essay Help for Your Convenience. Any Deadline - Any Subject. We cover any subject you have. Set the deadline and keep calm. Receive your papers on time. Detailed Writer Profiles. Email and SMS Notifications. Plagiarism Free Papers. We double-check all the assignments for plagiarism and send you only original essays. Chat With Your Writer.

Communicate directly with your writer anytime regarding assignment details, edit requests, etc. Affordable Prices. Assignment Essays Features. FREE Formatting. FREE Title page. FREE Outline. We Offer the Custom Writing Service with 3 Key Benefits. Assignment Essay Help. Best Customer Support Service. Affordable Essay Writing Service. Proceed To Order. Benefit From Assignment Essays Extras.

Quick Turnaround. Do you have an urgent order? Get your paper done in less than 4 hours. Message via chat and we'll immediately start working on your assignment. We ensure originality in every paper. We will provide you with a FREE Turnitin report with every essay upon request, so you'll know your paper is really plagiarism-free!

QA Department. An extra set of eyes never hurts! Your essay is examined by our QA experts before delivery. Flexible Discount System. The further the deadline or the higher the number of pages you order, the lower the price per page! We don't juggle when it comes to pricing! Unlimited Revisions. When asked how they would vote if the election for the US House of Representatives were held today, 56 percent of likely voters say they would vote for or lean toward the Democratic candidate, while 39 percent would vote for or lean toward the Republican candidate.

Democratic candidates are preferred by a point margin in Democratic-held districts, while Republican candidates are preferred by a point margin in Republican-held districts. Abortion is another prominent issue in this election. When asked about the importance of abortion rights, 61 percent of likely voters say the issue is very important in determining their vote for Congress and another 20 percent say it is somewhat important; just 17 percent say it is not too or not at all important.

With the controlling party in Congress hanging in the balance, 51 percent of likely voters say they are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for Congress this year; another 29 percent are somewhat enthusiastic while 19 percent are either not too or not at all enthusiastic. Today, Democrats and Republicans have about equal levels of enthusiasm, while independents are much less likely to be extremely or very enthusiastic. As Californians prepare to vote in the upcoming midterm election, fewer than half of adults and likely voters are satisfied with the way democracy is working in the United States—and few are very satisfied.

Satisfaction was higher in our February survey when 53 percent of adults and 48 percent of likely voters were satisfied with democracy in America. Today, half of Democrats and about four in ten independents are satisfied, compared to about one in five Republicans. Notably, four in ten Republicans are not at all satisfied. In addition to the lack of satisfaction with the way democracy is working, Californians are divided about whether Americans of different political positions can still come together and work out their differences.

Forty-nine percent are optimistic, while 46 percent are pessimistic. Today, in a rare moment of bipartisan agreement, about four in ten Democrats, Republicans, and independents are optimistic that Americans of different political views will be able to come together.

Notably, in , half or more across parties, regions, and demographic groups were optimistic. Today, about eight in ten Democrats—compared to about half of independents and about one in ten Republicans—approve of Governor Newsom.

Across demographic groups, about half or more approve of how Governor Newsom is handling his job. Approval of Congress among adults has been below 40 percent for all of after seeing a brief run above 40 percent for all of Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to approve of Congress. Fewer than half across regions and demographic groups approve of Congress. Approval in March was at 44 percent for adults and 39 percent for likely voters. Across demographic groups, about half or more approve among women, younger adults, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Latinos.

Views are similar across education and income groups, with just fewer than half approving. Approval in March was at 41 percent for adults and 36 percent for likely voters. Across regions, approval reaches a majority only in the San Francisco Bay Area. Across demographic groups, approval reaches a majority only among African Americans.

This map highlights the five geographic regions for which we present results; these regions account for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas in gray are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

The PPIC Statewide Survey is directed by Mark Baldassare, president and CEO and survey director at the Public Policy Institute of California. Coauthors of this report include survey analyst Deja Thomas, who was the project manager for this survey; associate survey director and research fellow Dean Bonner; and survey analyst Rachel Lawler. The Californians and Their Government survey is supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F.

Findings in this report are based on a survey of 1, California adult residents, including 1, interviewed on cell phones and interviewed on landline telephones. The sample included respondents reached by calling back respondents who had previously completed an interview in PPIC Statewide Surveys in the last six months. Interviews took an average of 19 minutes to complete.

Interviewing took place on weekend days and weekday nights from October 14—23, Cell phone interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of cell phone numbers. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of cell phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All cell phone numbers with California area codes were eligible for selection. After a cell phone user was reached, the interviewer verified that this person was age 18 or older, a resident of California, and in a safe place to continue the survey e. Cell phone respondents were offered a small reimbursement to help defray the cost of the call. Cell phone interviews were conducted with adults who have cell phone service only and with those who have both cell phone and landline service in the household.

Landline interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers that ensured that both listed and unlisted numbers were called. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of landline phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All landline telephone exchanges in California were eligible for selection. For both cell phones and landlines, telephone numbers were called as many as eight times. When no contact with an individual was made, calls to a number were limited to six. Also, to increase our ability to interview Asian American adults, we made up to three additional calls to phone numbers estimated by Survey Sampling International as likely to be associated with Asian American individuals.

Accent on Languages, Inc. The survey sample was closely comparable to the ACS figures. To estimate landline and cell phone service in California, Abt Associates used state-level estimates released by the National Center for Health Statistics—which used data from the National Health Interview Survey NHIS and the ACS. The estimates for California were then compared against landline and cell phone service reported in this survey. We also used voter registration data from the California Secretary of State to compare the party registration of registered voters in our sample to party registration statewide.

The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is ±3. This means that 95 times out of , the results will be within 3.

The sampling error for unweighted subgroups is larger: for the 1, registered voters, the sampling error is ±4. For the sampling errors of additional subgroups, please see the table at the end of this section. Sampling error is only one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by factors such as question wording, question order, and survey timing.

We present results for five geographic regions, accounting for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

We also present results for congressional districts currently held by Democrats or Republicans, based on residential zip code and party of the local US House member. We compare the opinions of those who report they are registered Democrats, registered Republicans, and no party preference or decline-to-state or independent voters; the results for those who say they are registered to vote in other parties are not large enough for separate analysis.

We also analyze the responses of likely voters—so designated per their responses to survey questions about voter registration, previous election participation, intentions to vote this year, attention to election news, and current interest in politics. The percentages presented in the report tables and in the questionnaire may not add to due to rounding. Additional details about our methodology can be found at www. pdf and are available upon request through surveys ppic.

October 14—23, 1, California adult residents; 1, California likely voters English, Spanish. Margin of error ±3. Percentages may not add up to due to rounding. Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that Gavin Newsom is handling his job as governor of California?

Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that the California Legislature is handling its job? Do you think things in California are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? Thinking about your own personal finances—would you say that you and your family are financially better off, worse off, or just about the same as a year ago?

Next, some people are registered to vote and others are not. Are you absolutely certain that you are registered to vote in California? Are you registered as a Democrat, a Republican, another party, or are you registered as a decline-to-state or independent voter?

Would you call yourself a strong Republican or not a very strong Republican? Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or Democratic Party?

Which one of the seven state propositions on the November 8 ballot are you most interested in? Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. It allows in-person sports betting at racetracks and tribal casinos, and requires that racetracks and casinos that offer sports betting to make certain payments to the state—such as to support state regulatory costs.

The fiscal impact is increased state revenues, possibly reaching tens of millions of dollars annually. Some of these revenues would support increased state regulatory and enforcement costs that could reach the low tens of millions of dollars annually.

If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 26? Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

It allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. It directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, and nonparticipating tribes.

Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 27?

Initiative Statute. It allocates tax revenues to zero-emission vehicle purchase incentives, vehicle charging stations, and wildfire prevention. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 30?

Do you agree or disagree with these statements? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that Joe Biden is handling his job as president?

Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Alex Padilla is handling his job as US Senator? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Dianne Feinstein is handling her job as US Senator?

Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way the US Congress is handling its job? Do you think things in the United States are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? How satisfied are you with the way democracy is working in the United States?

Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied, or not at all satisfied? These days, do you feel [rotate] [1] optimistic [or] [2] pessimistic that Americans of different political views can still come together and work out their differences? What is your opinion with regard to race relations in the United States today? Would you say things are [rotate 1 and 2] [1] better , [2] worse , or about the same than they were a year ago?

When it comes to racial discrimination, which do you think is the bigger problem for the country today—[rotate] [1] People seeing racial discrimination where it really does NOT exist [or] [2] People NOT seeing racial discrimination where it really DOES exist?

Next, Next, would you consider yourself to be politically: [read list, rotate order top to bottom]. Generally speaking, how much interest would you say you have in politics—a great deal, a fair amount, only a little, or none?

Mark Baldassare is president and CEO of the Public Policy Institute of California, where he holds the Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Chair in Public Policy. He is a leading expert on public opinion and survey methodology, and has directed the PPIC Statewide Survey since He is an authority on elections, voter behavior, and political and fiscal reform, and the author of ten books and numerous publications.

Before joining PPIC, he was a professor of urban and regional planning in the School of Social Ecology at the University of California, Irvine, where he held the Johnson Chair in Civic Governance. He has conducted surveys for the Los Angeles Times , the San Francisco Chronicle , and the California Business Roundtable.

He holds a PhD in sociology from the University of California, Berkeley. Dean Bonner is associate survey director and research fellow at PPIC, where he coauthors the PPIC Statewide Survey—a large-scale public opinion project designed to develop an in-depth profile of the social, economic, and political attitudes at work in California elections and policymaking.

He has expertise in public opinion and survey research, political attitudes and participation, and voting behavior. Before joining PPIC, he taught political science at Tulane University and was a research associate at the University of New Orleans Survey Research Center.

He holds a PhD and MA in political science from the University of New Orleans.

The Lockheed Martin F Lightning II Canadian procurement is a defence procurement project of the Canadian government to purchase Lockheed Martin F Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters for the Royal Canadian Air Force RCAF , a process started in ; on 28 March , the government announced that the competition process had selected the FA and that negotiations would begin with Lockheed Martin to purchase 88 aircraft.

The F procurement has been a source of considerable controversy in public policy circles in Canada since the federal government announced its intention to purchase the aircraft in In April , with the release of a highly critical Auditor General of Canada report on the failures of the government's F program, the procurement was labelled a national "scandal" and "fiasco" by the media. The F was conceived by the United States Department of Defense as requiring participation from many countries, either contributing to the manufacturing of the aircraft or procuring it for their own armed forces.

Canada, through the Department of National Defence DND and the departments of Public Works and Government Services Canada PWGSC and Industry Canada IC , has been actively involved in the Joint Strike Fighter JSF project since Once Lockheed Martin was selected as the JSF's primary contractor, Canada elected to become a level-three participant along with Norway, Denmark, Turkey, and Australia in the project. This, combined with the government's refusal to provide detailed costing of the procurement, became one of the major causes of the finding of contempt of Parliament and the subsequent defeat of the Conservative government through a non-confidence vote on 25 March The F purchase was a major issue in the Canadian federal election , which resulted in a Conservative majority government.

The F did not feature in the Harper government's federal budget tabled in March and was not mentioned in the Conservative Party election platform. On 19 October , the Liberal Party of Canada under Justin Trudeau won a majority in part on a campaign promise to not buy the F, but instead "one of the many, lower-priced options that better match Canada's defence needs". A formal competition was launched to select a new fighter, which included the F On 28 March , the government announced that the competition process had selected the FA and that negotiations would begin with Lockheed Martin to purchase 88 aircraft.

Alan S. Williams of Queen's University , the former Assistant Deputy Minister of National Defence Matériel who signed the original industrial participation agreement, indicated he believes that the Government of Canada's rationale for joining the JSF project was not due to an urgent need to replace the Canadian Forces' CF Hornet fleet; instead, it was driven primarily by economics.

Improved interoperability with major allies allowed the Canadian Forces to gain insight on leading edge practices in composites, manufacturing and logistics, and offered the ability to recoup some investment if the government did decide to purchase the F As a result of the Government of Canada's investment in the JSF project, contracts were awarded to Canadian companies, universities, and government facilities. In the Canadian government, along with its allies; the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Denmark, Australia, Turkey, Italy and Norway [18] signed a memorandum of understanding , at an anticipated cost of over half a billion dollars to Canada, for "Production, Sustainment and Follow-on Development" for the period to The Canadian air force concluded the F was the most cost effective plane to meet its needs.

However, only one JSF test model existed at that time and there was no way to actually prove the JSF had the lowest cost per aircraft or that it would be the cheapest to fly. Canada emphasized that the commitment does not mean Canada would purchase the plane. Canada also had to accept F procurement rules, according to the auditor general, who claimed ministers were not fully informed of this aspect.

On 12 May , the Canada First Defence Strategy called for replacing the CF fleet, beginning in The Pentagon notifies Canada that the U. is "reassessing its cost projections" because of expected delays in development, according to the auditor general.

Conservative Defence Minister Peter MacKay told the Commons that Canada would buy the F Ninety minutes later, he said he misspoke and announced there will be an open competition with all aircraft considered.

Six weeks later, ignoring what he previously said, MacKay announced that Canada will purchase 65 Fs. Deliveries were to begin in On 16 July , the government announced plans to acquire 65 Fs, calling it the only fifth-generation design that can meet Canada's needs and ensure interoperability with NATO allies. Key decisions were made without required approvals or supporting documentation. The Montreal Gazette reported in September that the Canadian Forces had planned to hold a competition in , award a contract in , and for the new fighter to become operational between and , when the sole sourced contract was announced.

On 6 October , retired Assistant Deputy Minister of National Defence Matériel Alan Williams testified before the House of Commons Defence Committee regarding the F, which the Canadian media had referring to as a Flying Credit Card — with no prefixed spending limit. In his testimony, Williams indicated that the lack of a competition was likely to squander billions of dollars in taxes and lost business opportunities: "Procurement demands not only the highest degree of integrity, but also the appearance of the highest degree of integrity.

Undertaking sole-source deals leaves the procurement process more vulnerable to fraud, bribery and behind the scene deal making and leaves the federal government more susceptible to such charges.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper responded to Williams' testimony, attacking his integrity and accused him of changing his mind. Williams in turn responded to Harper: "That's a lie I've never ever changed my opinion about sole-sourcing. I have no idea to what he's referring to. I take great offence to that. On 14 October , the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives issued a report on the proposed F buy entitled Pilot Error — Why the F Lightning II stealth fighter is wrong for Canada.

The Canadian government should not proceed On 26 October , Sheila Fraser , Auditor General of Canada , identified "troubling" systemic problems, rigged competitions and cost overruns in defence procurement programs and indicated that the F may cost far more than the budgeted numbers. Retired Canadian Forces Lieutenant-General Angus Watt in October said of the F "It's the best of all the available choices.

It provides the best value for money, the best platform to address the security needs of Canada through to , which is probably how long we'll have this airplane The F gives us a jet at the beginning of its technological life span. If you buy a jet at the end of its life span, that means in five to ten years it's going to be obsolete.

That means you're going to have to try to add technology and that's really tough. The growth potential, the ability to evolve this jet over the next 30—40 years, far surpasses anything else on the market Stealth is not some voodoo technology It simply allows the pilot to survive. It isn't necessary for every mission, but for some. For instance, reconnaissance.

They can go quietly into territory, undetected, and come back safely. Or they can do a mission like the Kosovo bombing campaign, where there was a fairly sophisticated air defence system, and come back completely safely. Philippe Lagassé, a defence analyst at the University of Ottawa , disagreed that stealth benefits domestic interception. On 17 November, the Standing Committee on Finance asked the parliamentary budget officer to analyze F costs.

By late , Canada's political parties had outlined their positions on the F The Conservatives had declared it their top defence priority, the Liberals indicated that they would hold a competition to select a new fighter, the New Democratic Party was opposed to the purchase and the Bloc Québécois were in favour of it only as long as Quebec aerospace firms get a share of the work.

In January , United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated that the FB variant would be put on two years probation due to delays and development difficulties and that the program was troubled. The announcement led to DND officials assuring that Canadian F deliveries would not be delayed. Major-General Tom Lawson, the Assistant Chief of the Air Staff stated: "without hesitation this is the only aircraft for the future.

But all of the concerns that we've expressed in the past continue to exist. And I, from my point of view, feel that we're not out of the woods with the development of this aircraft We should be only looking at an aircraft that is certified, developed, and for which we have a firm cost and a delivery. And that's obviously not the case today. The Government continued to defend the F, drawing parallels with the Liberal cancellation of the EH helicopter in Prime Minister Stephen Harper made speeches at aerospace plants in an attempt to gain support.

The Liberal party accused Harper of hypocrisy, as records indicate he was in favour of the EH cancellation at the time. Liberal industry critic Marc Garneau explained his party's position on competitively selecting a new fighter: "We know we can get a better deal for Canadians, with guaranteed offsets.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail Natynczyk stated: "From my perspective, the F is the best aircraft with the best value for Canada The cost per unit is the cheapest for any fourth- or fifth-generation aircraft". In January , the Government enlisted the aid of two retired generals, Paul Manson and Angus Watt , to write a defence of the purchase, entitled The truth about those jets.

Their position, particularly on the lack of need for a competition, was refuted by former Assistant Deputy Minister of National Defence Materiel Alan Williams: "For Canada to commit to purchase an aircraft without knowing for certain what it will cost nor how it will perform operationally makes no sense. If the F is, in fact, the best aircraft for Canada it will win a competition.

I cannot understand why its supporters are fearful of subjecting it to an open, fair and transparent competition. Steven Staples, President of the Rideau Institute, said: "While this fact in no way disqualifies the generals from sharing their opinion, it is an important truth about the F debate that the stealth fighters' strongest backers are the military and the aerospace companies.

In fact, it's getting awfully hard to tell them apart. Liberal MP Bryon Wilfert , who reviewed DND public service overtime statistics, stated: "The lines are being blurred between government workers and the Conservative party.

This is supposed to stand on its own as the best aircraft that we need, so why is it up to civil servants to sell it to the public? The Government of Canada planned to purchase the FA, the same model as the United States Air Force USAF. However, unlike the FC for the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps , the FA cannot refuel from the Canadian Forces' existing tanker aircraft, which use the US Navy-style probe and drogue system.

Additionally, the FA cannot land on the short runways of the Canadian Forces' forward operating air strips in the Arctic. Harper attacked the Liberal calls for a competition, citing damages to Canada's aerospace sector: "I don't understand how the Liberal MPs from this region could want to cancel the contract". Minister of National Defence Peter MacKay stated that cancelling the deal would "endanger the lives of Canadian pilots" and "endanger the sovereignty of this country", although he did not give specifics as to why that would be the case.

In an editorial, The Globe and Mail said, "The PBO raises sharp questions. An accountable government, one that tried to convince on the basis of evidence, would answer them. After reviewing the report, the opposition Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe was reportedly shocked by the cost and changed his mind on supporting the sole-sourced F procurement and began to oppose it as unaffordable, favouring open competition instead.

None of us can know for certain what the final cost to acquire the F will be until we get a firm price quote. As production increases, the costs may drop. On 21 March, a parliamentary committee recommended the government be held in contempt of Parliament for failing to provide enough documents, including per-plane F cost estimates. Commentators suggested that the deployment of six CFs to Operation Odyssey Dawn was to symbolically make the case for the F a poor choice for the United States — and for Canada".

This poll showed increased public opposition to the F over a similar poll conducted in November On 22 March , the conservative government's budget presentation was poorly received by all three opposition parties. Liberal Party leader Michael Ignatieff moved a motion of non-confidence on 26 March , which declared the government to be in contempt of Parliament over withheld costing data on prison construction and the F All opposition parties supported the motion, triggering the federal election , in which the F was a key issue.

On 28 March , The Globe and Mail revealed that the Conservative Party candidate for the Ontario riding of Algoma-Manitoulin-Kapuskasing , Raymond Sturgeon , was until December a paid lobbyist working at CFN Consultants and lobbying the government on behalf of Lockheed Martin.

This government will drastically reduce the size of this deal — why 65? The Eurofighter Typhoon and the Super Hornet were specifically named, while the Dassault Rafale and Saab Gripen may also be considered. I'm able to bring back a real insider's view, if you will, about where that world is heading — data, analytics, databases, machine learning, and how all those things come together, and how you really need to view what's happening with data as an end-to-end story. NDP MP Jack Harris said "They can't paper this over. The sampling error for unweighted subgroups is larger: for the 1, registered voters, the sampling error is ±4. Open finance has supported more inclusive, competitive financial systems for consumers and small businesses in the U. All landline telephone exchanges in California were eligible for selection.

Categories:

• Forex
• Binary Options
• Forex Bitcoin
• Forex Brokers
• Binary Options online